Key result
A postinterventional transmitral gradient by continuous-wave Doppler of ≥5 mm Hg best predicted elevated transmitral gradients at discharge following MitraClip implantation.
Why the study?
Which echocardiographic method best predicts elevated transmitral gradients at discharge in patients undergoing MitraClip implantation?
Observational (n=33)
Which echocardiographic method best predicts elevated transmitral gradients at discharge in patients undergoing MitraClip implantation?
Transmitral gradients measured by continuous-wave Doppler are superior to direct 3D echocardiographic MVA assessment for predicting elevated transmitral gradients at discharge after MitraClip implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support preferring CW Doppler ≥5 mm Hg over 3D MVA for post-MitraClip prediction; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background— Quantification of the mitral valve area (MVA) is important to guide percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system. However, little is known about how to best assess MVA in this specific situation. Methods and Results— Immediately before and after MitraClip implantation, comprehensive 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography data were acquired for MVA assessment by the pressure half-time method and by two 3D quantification methods (mitral valve quantification software and 3D quantification software). In addition, transmitral gradients by continuous-wave Doppler (dPmean CW ) were measured to indirectly assess MVA. Data are given as median (interquartile range). Thirty-three patients (39% women) with a median age of 77.1 years (12.4 years) were studied. Before intervention, the median MVAs by the pressure half-time method, mitral valve quantification software, and 3D quantification software were 4.4 cm 2 (2.0 cm 2 ), 4.7 cm 2 (2.4 cm 2 ), and 6.2 cm 2 (2.4 cm 2 ), respectively ( P <0.001). After intervention, MVA was reduced to 1.9 cm 2 (0.7 cm 2 ), 2.1 cm 2 (1.1 cm 2 ), and 2.8 cm 2 (1.1 cm 2 ), respectively ( P =0.001). The median values for dPmean CW before and after intervention were 1.0 mm Hg (1.0 mm Hg) and 3.0 mm Hg (3.0 mm Hg; P <0.001), respectively. At discharge, the median dPmean CW was 4.0 mm Hg (3.0 mm Hg). In multivariate regression analyses including body surface area, the 3 different MVA methods, and dPmean CW , a post-dPmean CW ≥5 mm Hg was the best independent predictor of an elevated transmitral gradient at discharge. Conclusions— Transmitral gradients by continuous-wave Doppler are quick, feasible in all patients, and superior to direct peri-interventional assessment of MVA. A postinterventional transmitral gradient by continuous-wave Doppler of ≥5 mm Hg best predicted elevated transmitral gradients at discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biaggi et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Mitral valve disease requiring percutaneous repair (n=33). MitraClip implantation and MVA assessment methods was evaluated on Prediction of an elevated transmitral gradient at discharge. A postinterventional transmitral gradient by continuous-wave Doppler of ≥5 mm Hg best predicted elevated transmitral gradients at discharge following MitraClip implantation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: