Why the study?
SCORE2-OP has shown modest performance when externally validated in selected cohorts, prompting evaluation of its predictive performance and clinical utility in an unbiased, representative older cohort in a low cardiovascular risk country.
Does the SCORE2-OP model accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk in older individuals without established cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=791)
Does the SCORE2-OP model accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk in older individuals without established cardiovascular disease?
The SCORE2-OP model provides good 10-year cardiovascular risk discrimination in older adults from a low-risk region, and its accuracy can be further improved by incorporating echocardiographic valvular calcification.
May enhance SCORE2-OP discrimination in older adults; hypothesis-generating for valvular calcification pending prospective validation.
AIMS: European Systematic Coronary Risk Assessment 2 for Older Persons (SCORE2-OP) model has shown modest performance when externally validated in selected cohorts. We aim to investigate its predictive performance and clinical utility for 10-year cardiovascular (CV) risk in an unbiased and representative cohort of older people of a low CV risk country. Furthermore, we explore whether other clinical or echocardiographic features could improve its performance. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of randomly selected individuals ≥65 years from a primary care population of Barcelona without established CV disease included 791 patients (63.1% female, median age 76 years, median follow-up 11.8 years). The model's performance yielded a Harrell's C-statistic of 0.706 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.659-0.753) for the primary endpoint (myocardial infarction, stroke, and CV mortality) and 0.692 (95% CI 0.649-0.734) for the secondary endpoint (primary endpoint plus heart failure hospitalization), with better discrimination in females. SCORE2-OP underestimated the risk of primary endpoint in women [expected/observed (E/O) = 0.77], slightly overestimated in men (E/O = 1.06), and systematically underestimated the risk of the secondary endpoint (E/O = 0.52). Decision curve analysis showed net clinical benefit across a 7.5-30% risk range for primary endpoint. Valvular calcification was the only variable that significantly improved 10-year SCORE2-OP risk performance for both primary and secondary endpoints, with a change in Harrell's C of 0.028 (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: In a low CV risk country, SCORE2-OP showed notable discrimination and excellent calibration to predict 10-year CV risk, with better performance in females. Incorporating valvular calcification in a future revised score may enhance accuracy and reduce unnecessary treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belahnech et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk prediction (n=791). SCORE2-OP model was evaluated on myocardial infarction, stroke, and CV mortality (Harrell's C-statistic 0.706, 95% CI 0.659-0.753).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: