Key result
A unique left ventricular remodelling signature characterized by an axis shift differentiated severe aortic stenosis from systemic hypertension with an AUC of 0.792, and predicted mass regression post-AVR.
Why the study?
Differentiating left ventricular hypertrophy caused by aortic stenosis from that caused by systemic hypertension is lacking, as is an understanding of the impact of surgical aortic valve replacement.
Does 3-dimensional geometric remodelling assessed by CMR differentiate left ventricular hypertrophy due to severe aortic stenosis from systemic hypertension, and how does surgical AVR impact this remodelling?
Observational (n=91)
No
Does 3-dimensional geometric remodelling assessed by CMR differentiate left ventricular hypertrophy due to severe aortic stenosis from systemic hypertension, and how does surgical AVR impact this remodelling?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unique 3D geometric remodeling signatures on CMR can differentiate LV hypertrophy due to aortic stenosis from systemic hypertension, and LV axis shift predicts mass regression post-AVR.
(2) Abstract Background Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy occurs in both aortic stenosis (AS) and systemic hypertension (HTN) in response to wall stress. However, differentiation of hypertrophy due to these two aetiologies is lacking, as well as an understanding of the impact of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). The aim was to study the 3-dimensional geometric remodelling pattern in severe AS pre– and post-surgical AVR, and to compare with HTN and healthy controls. Methods Ninety-one subjects (36 severe AS, 19 HTN and 36 healthy controls) underwent cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). CMR was repeated eight months post-AVR (n=18). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the 3-dimensional meshes reconstructed from 109 CMR myocardial contours of 91 subjects at end-diastole. PCA modes were compared across experimental groups. Results A unique AS signature was identified by wall thickness linked to a LV left-right axis shift and a decrease in short axis eccentricity. HTN was uniquely linked to increased septal thickness. Combining these three features had good discriminative ability between AS and HTN (AUC=0.792). The LV left-right axis shift was not reversible post-AVR and was predictive of post-operative LV mass regression (R 2 =0.339, p=0.014). AVR was associated with a reduction in global LV size and correction of short axis eccentricity. Conclusions Unique remodelling signatures can differentiate the aetiology of LV hypertrophy. LV axis shift is characteristic in AS, is not reversible post AVR, predicts mass regression, and is interpreted to be an adaptive mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmod et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis and systemic hypertension (n=91). Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) vs. Systemic hypertension and healthy controls was evaluated on Discriminative ability between AS and HTN using combined PCA modes (4, 6, and 18) (AUC 0.792). A unique left ventricular remodelling signature characterized by an axis shift differentiated severe aortic stenosis from systemic hypertension with an AUC of 0.792, and predicted mass regression post-AVR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: