Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article presents a new history of digital pagination. Virtual pagination works very differently from its print correlate. Despite this, encapsulated and paginated formats have gained a solid digital foothold. Nonetheless, many commentators have argued that we must overcome such a reliance on and continuity with print in the digital space. This article charts a fresh history of the development of digital pagination through a revisionist interrogation of three interrelated phenomena: 1. digital pages do not behave as do their physical correlates but instead mimic earlier historical forms of print that fused pagination, scrolling, and the tablet form. 2. the development of PDF was almost abandoned by Adobe’s board of directors, who could see no audience for it. 3. there are other more robust lineages of constraint for digital pages from cinema and television. on new correspondence with the creators of the PDF format I argue from these historical tracings that nothing was sure about the development of textual pagination in the digital space. Further, the digital page almost never came to the prominence and dominance now presumed in discussions of digital reading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: