Key result
Handheld echocardiography by cardiology trainees showed moderate to excellent agreement with standard echocardiography, with kappa coefficients from 0.56 for wall motion to 0.81 for LV dilation.
Why the study?
Does handheld echocardiography performed by trainees accurately detect functional and morphological heart abnormalities compared to standard echocardiography in admitted cardiology patients?
Population
56 consecutive patients admitted to a Cardiology Department, mean age 60.0 ± 11.9 years, 26 women.
Comparison
Handheld echocardiography with B-mode… vs Standard echocardiography performed by…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support trainee handheld echocardiography as bedside adjunct; leaves open prospective outcome validation before wider adoption.
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
No
Does handheld echocardiography performed by trainees accurately detect functional and morphological heart abnormalities compared to standard echocardiography in admitted cardiology patients?
Handheld echocardiography performed by cardiology trainees shows substantial to excellent agreement with standard echocardiography for assessing LV dimensions and valve morphology, supporting its utility as a bedside adjunct.
Giuşcă et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=56). Handheld echocardiography (HHE) by cardiology trainees vs. Standard echocardiography (SE) by cardiologists was evaluated on Agreement (Kappa coefficient) between handheld and standard echocardiography for functional and morphological cardiac parameters. Handheld echocardiography by cardiology trainees showed moderate to excellent agreement with standard echocardiography, with kappa coefficients from 0.56 for wall motion to 0.81 for LV dilation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: