Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 1, 2008The Journal of Urology

Evaluating the Evidence: Statistical Methods in Randomized Controlled Trials in the Urological Literature

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

CSCharles D. ScalesDuke UniversityRNRegina D. NorrisUniversity of PittsburghGPGlenn M. PremingerDuke University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Scales et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d9a75cecdf5fb20ba835ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.026
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials1994 · 113 citations
  2. 2Inadequate Statistical Power of Negative Clinical Trials in Urological Literature2006 · 43 citations