Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study shows lower 30-day mortality and fewer blood transfusions with minimally invasive extracorporeal circuits in dialysis patients, indicating potential survival benefits.
Introduction Cardiac surgery in patients on chronic renal dialysis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circuits (MiECC) have shown a positive impact on patient outcome in different high-risk populations. This retrospective study compares the outcome of these high-risk patients undergoing heart surgery either with a MiECC or a conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC). Methods This is a single-center experience including 131 consecutive dialysis dependent patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2006 and December 2016. A propensity score matching was employed leaving 30 matched cases in each group. Results After propensity score matching the 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the MiECC group ( n = 3 (10%) vs n = 10 (33%) in the CECC group, p = .028). Further, intraoperative transfused units of packed red blood cells were lower in the MiECC group (1.4 ± 1.8 units vs 2.8 ± 1.7, p < .001). Conclusions There are evident advantages to using MiECC in dialysis dependent patients, especially regarding mortality. These findings necessitate additional research in MiECC usage in high-risk populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: