In today's rapidly evolving digital era, organizations are increasingly challenged to integrate advanced technologies with sustainability and corporate responsibility. Despite extensive literature on digital transformation, a gap remains in understanding how firms strategically align technological innovation with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles. This study addresses that gap by proposing a strategic framework that integrates Dynamic Capabilities Theory, the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework, and ESG considerations to guide sustainable digital transformation. Adopting a comparative multiple case study design, the research analyzes five global industry leaders—Amazon, Tesla, Alibaba, Google, and Unilever—across e-commerce, technology, automotive, and consumer goods sectors. Using secondary data from peer-reviewed literature and corporate disclosures, the study explores how these companies navigate the complex interplay between innovation, organizational resilience, and ESG performance. We apply thematic coding and cross-case pattern matching under a DCT × TOE × ESG lens to structure the analysis. The findings reveal that successful digital transformation strategies are anchored in three core practices: leveraging AI-driven technologies to enhance operational efficiency, embedding ESG values into strategic processes, and adapting organizational structures to dynamic environments. For example, Amazon and Alibaba utilize AI to optimize logistics with sustainability goals; Tesla and Google balance product-centric and platform-centric innovation to advance environmental objectives, while Unilever leads in ESG-driven digitalization in the consumer goods sector. Theoretically, this study contributes an integrated framework for scholars exploring digital sustainability. Practically, it offers decision-makers a roadmap to align innovation with ethical imperatives and long-term value creation. Future research could extend the model through empirical validation, particularly in emerging markets and small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs), addressing scalability and contextual relevance in broader economic settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikram Abbes (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: