Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Design research (DR) positions information technology artifacts at the core of the Information Systems. However, dominant DR thinking takes a technological view of the IT artifact, paying scant attention its shaping by the organizational context. Consequently, existing DR methods focus on building the artifact relegate evaluation to a subsequent and separate phase. They value technological rigor at the cost of relevance, and fail to recognize that the artifact emerges from interaction with the context even when its initial design is guided by the researchers’ intent. We propose action design research (ADR) as a new DR method to address this problem. ADR reflects the premise that IT artifacts are ensembles shaped by the organizational context during development and use. The conceptualizes the research process as containing the inseparable and inherently interwoven activities building the IT artifact, intervening in the organization, and evaluating it concurrently. The essay describes stages of ADR and associated principles that encapsulate its underlying beliefs and values. We illustrate ADR through a case of competence management at Volvo IT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sein et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: