Objectives: To measure the percentage of patients requiring gastrostomy tubes (G‐tubes) and the timing of their placement, in addition to studying whether pretreatment variables (T stage, tumor site, N stage) and intratreatment variables (weight loss during treatment) are valid predictors for the need for G‐tube placement. Study Design: Retrospective case control study. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database with chart reviews was carried out on 477 patients treated on a regimen of intraarterial cisplatin and concurrent radiation. The likelihood of requiring a G‐tube was calculated by studying several independent variables using chi‐square analysis and the unpaired t test. Results: Two hundred twenty (46%) patients had G‐tubes placed, with mean time of placement being on day 20 after the initiation of treatment. Patients with T4 disease were statistically more likely to require a G‐tube (50% vs. 37%, P < .05). Patients were less likely to require a G‐tube when the primary site of tumor involved the larynx or paranasal sinuses ( P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regards to patient age, sex, N stage, and weight changes over the course of treatment. The odds of requiring a G‐tube were highest for tumors involving the hypopharynx (80%), oral cavity (52%), and oropharynx (49%). Conclusions: Although clinical judgment appears to be sufficient for deciding when G‐tube placement is warranted in our population, the threshold for placing a tube should be lower in those patients who had a higher likelihood of requiring a G‐tube during the course of treatment, including those with advanced disease of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and hypopharynx.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: