Benchmark evaluation reveals frontier language models achieve at most 61.2% F1 on multi-document reasoning tasks, highlighting persistent limitations in handling complex information-seeking queries.
Automated agents, powered by large language models (LLMs), are emerging as the go-to tool for querying information. However, evaluation benchmarks for LLM agents rarely feature natural questions that are both information-seeking and genuinely time-consuming for humans. To address this gap we introduce MoNaCo, a benchmark of 1,315 natural and time-consuming questions that require dozens, and at times hundreds, of intermediate steps to solve— far more than any existing QA benchmark. To build MoNaCo, we developed a decomposed annotation pipeline to elicit and manually answer real-world time-consuming questions at scale. Frontier LLMs evaluated on MoNaCo achieve at most 61.2% F1, hampered by low recall and hallucinations. Our results underscore the limitations of LLM-powered agents in handling the complexity and sheer breadth of real-world information-seeking tasks—with MoNaCo providing an effective resource for tracking such progress. The MoNaCo benchmark, codebase, prompts, and models predictions are all publicly available at: https://tomerwolgithub.github.io/monaco.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolfson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: