Key result
Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria show excellent short-term repeatability and high within-visit agreement.
Why the study?
While the newly developed Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria have greater sensitivity for LVH than the Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon criteria, its short-term repeatability was unknown.
Does the Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria have good short-term repeatability and agreement with standard criteria?
Observational
Does the Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria have good short-term repeatability and agreement with standard criteria?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97)
The Peguero-Lo Presti ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy demonstrate excellent short-term repeatability and agreement, supporting their use in clinical practice and epidemiological studies.
Supports short-term reliability of Peguero-Lo Presti criteria; leaves open validation in longitudinal studies before routine adoption.
BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) represents preclinical cardiovascular disease and predicts cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. While the newly developed Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria have greater sensitivity for LVH than the Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon criteria, its short-term repeatability is unknown. Therefore, we characterized the short-term repeatability of Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria and evaluate its agreement with Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon ECG-LVH criteria. METHODS: ) and defined Peguero-Lo Presti LVH index as ≥ 2,300 µV among women and ≥ 2,800 µV among men. We estimated repeatability as an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), agreement as a prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa coefficient (κ), and precision using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The Peguero-Lo Presti index was repeatable: ICC (95% CI) = 0.94 (0.91-0.97). Within-visit agreement of Peguero-Lo Presti LVH was high at the first and second visits: κ (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.91-1.00) and 1.00 (1.00-1.00). Between-visit agreement of the first and second measurements at each visit was comparable: κ (95% CI) = 0.90 (0.80-1.00) and 0.93 (0.85-1.00). Agreement of Peguero-Lo Presti and Cornell or Sokolow-Lyon LVH on any one of the four ECGs was slightly lower: κ (95% CI) = 0.71 (0.54-0.89). CONCLUSION: The Peguero-Lo Presti index and LVH have excellent repeatability and agreement, which support their use in clinical and epidemiological studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drager et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH). Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria vs. Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon ECG-LVH criteria was evaluated on Short-term repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient) (ICC 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97). The Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria demonstrated excellent short-term repeatability (ICC 0.94; 95% CI 0.91-0.97) and high within-visit agreement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: