Key result
Continuous ECG LVH criteria demonstrate excellent short-term repeatability with an intraclass correlation of 0.97.
Why the study?
Although clinical trials and cohort studies commonly use ECG for LVH assessment, the repeatability of ECG-LVH criteria has not been sufficiently examined.
What is the short-term repeatability of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy?
Observational (n=63)
No
What is the short-term repeatability of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.97 (95% CI 0.96, 0.98)
Commonly used ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy demonstrate excellent short-term repeatability, supporting their reliable use in clinical trials and epidemiologic studies.
Supports ECG LVH criteria reliability in trials; leaves open broader clinical validation.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a marker of cardiac end-organ damage and a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although clinical trials and cohort studies commonly use the electrocardiogram (ECG) for LVH assessment, the repeatability of ECG-LVH criteria has not been sufficiently examined. Therefore, we evaluated the repeatability of ECG-LVH criteria. METHODS: Participants (n = 63) underwent two standard ECGs at each of two visits, two weeks apart. The ECGs were processed centrally to calculate Cornell voltage (CV) LVH, Cornell voltage product (CVP) LVH, Sokolow-Lyon (SL) LVH, and Sokolow-Lyon product (SLP) LVH. We also used the waveforms measurements contributing to these LVH criteria as continuous variables, referred to here as CV-index, CVP-index, and SL-index. We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), minimal detectable change (95% confidence), and the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). RESULTS: ICCs (95% confidence intervals (CI)) were 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) for CV-index, 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) for CVP-index, and 0.93 (0.90, 0.96) for log of SL-index. Minimal detectable change between repeat measures of CV-index, CVP-index, and log of SL-index were ≥236.7 mV, ≥26.7 mV, and ≥0.09 mV, respectively. The within-visit PABAK was 1 for all ECG-LVH criteria, except for the first visit SLP-LVH (PABAK = 0.93). Between-visit PABAK ranged from 0.83 to 0.97 across LVH criteria. CONCLUSIONS: CV, CVP, and SL ECG-LVH as continuous variables have excellent repeatability, and as binary variables have excellent within-visit agreement and good between-visit agreement. These results alleviate concerns about the repeatability the ECG-LVH use in clinical trials and epidemiologic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=63). Standard 12-lead ECG was evaluated on Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for Cornell voltage index (ICC 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.98). Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy criteria as continuous variables demonstrated excellent short-term repeatability, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.97 for Cornell voltage and Cornell voltage product indices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: