In an effort to better understand the physics and structure of coherent events in a turbulent boundary layer, an attempt is made to produce ‘‘artificial’’ bursts. These are generated in a turbulent boundary layer developed on a flat plate towed in an 18 m water channel and thus with negligible freestream turbulence. The burstlike events are produced by either withdrawing near-wall fluid from two minute holes separated in the spanwise direction or by pitching a miniature delta wing that is flush-mounted to the wall. Either of these two actions generates a hairpinlike vortex and low-speed streak that resemble naturally occurring structures. The resulting sequence of events that occur at a given location can be uniquely controlled, thus allowing detailed examination via phase-locked measurements and flow visualization. In this paper, the proof of concept of artificial burst generation is established by comparing the artificial events with natural, random bursts using flow visualization and hot-film signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gad‐el‐Hak et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: