Key result
TCD correlates with LV size and function across all LVEF, while CTR only reflects depressed LVEF.
Why the study?
Can cardiothoracic ratio or transverse cardiac diameter predict left ventricular size and systolic function in patients suspected of coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=181)
Can cardiothoracic ratio or transverse cardiac diameter predict left ventricular size and systolic function in patients suspected of coronary artery disease?
Transverse cardiac diameter is a more reliable indicator of left ventricular size and systolic function than cardiothoracic ratio on chest radiography, particularly in patients with preserved ejection fraction.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), transverse cardiac diameter (TCD), and left ventricular (LV) size and systolic function in patients with or without preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: A total of 181 subjects suspected with coronary artery disease underwent chest radiography (CR) and dual source computed tomography coronary angiography (DSCT-CA). TCD and CTR were derived from CR. The LV size and systolic function parameters, such as LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) and LVEF were measured from DSCT-CA. The association between TCD, CTR and LV size and systolic function parameters were analyzed according to LVEF value (< 55%, depressed LVEF group; versus ≥ 55%, preserved LVEF group). RESULTS: Both TCD and CTR were higher in the depressed LVEF group compared with the preserved LVEF group. Significant correlations were found between TCD, CTR and LVEDV, LVESV, LVEF in depressed LVEF group. However, there was no significant association detected between CTR and LV size and systolic function parameters in preserved LVEF group. Both the LVEDV and LVESV showed a positive correlation with TCD in preserved LVEF group. CONCLUTION: Although CTR was not a reliable indicator of LV size and systolic function in patients with preserved LVEF, it was correlated with LV size and LVEF in depressed LVEF patients. Furthermore, TCD showed stronger correlations with LV size and systolic function even in patients with preserved LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=181). Transverse cardiac diameter (TCD) and cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) was evaluated on Association with left ventricular size (LVEDV, LVESV) and systolic function (LVEF). Transverse cardiac diameter (TCD) correlated with left ventricular size and systolic function in patients with both preserved and depressed LVEF, whereas CTR only correlated in depressed LVEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: