Key result
Cardiothoracic ratio strongly correlates with LVEDVI and LVEF only in patients with depressed LVEF.
Why the study?
Does cardiothoracic ratio correlate with left ventricular size and systolic function in patients suspected of coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=203)
No
Does cardiothoracic ratio correlate with left ventricular size and systolic function in patients suspected of coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: r=0.66
p-value: p=<0.001
Cardiothoracic ratio measured by chest radiography correlates with left ventricular size and systolic function in patients with depressed LVEF, but is not a reliable indicator in patients with preserved LVEF.
The present study aimed to investigate the association between cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and left ventricular (LV) systolic function parameters in patients with or without preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). A total of 203 subjects suspected with coronary artery disease underwent chest radiography and dual source computed tomography coronary angiography (DSCT‑CA). The LV systolic function parameters: LV end‑diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LV end‑systolic volume index (LVESVI), and LVEF were measured from the DSCT‑CA. The association between CTR and LV systolic function parameters was analyzed according to LVEF value (<55%, depressed LVEF group; versus ≥55%, preserved LVEF group) and CTR value (<0.5, normal range CTR group; versus ≥0.5, larger CTR group). The LVEDVI and LVESVI were higher in the depressed LVEF group compared with the preserved LVEF group (108.56±57.15 vs. 67.52±14.56 ml/m2, P<0.001; and 64.07±37.81 vs. 20.23±7.23 ml/m2, P<0.001, respectively) and lower in the normal range CTR group compared with the larger CTR group (67.10±15.00 vs. 77.30±34.32 ml/m2, P=0.009 and 21.94±8.96 vs. 28.97±26.54 ml/m2, P=0.017, respectively). Significant correlations were found between CTR and LVEDVI, and LVESVI and LVEF in the depressed LVEF group (r=0.66, P<0.001; r=0.65, P<0.001; and r=‑0.46, P=0.018, respectively). However, there was no significant association detected between CTR and LV systolic function parameters in the other subgroups. The LVEDVI and LVESVI showed an inverse correlation with the LVEF in each group. Although the CTR was not a reliable indicator of LV size and systolic function in patients with preserved LVEF, it was correlated with LV size and LVEF in patients with depressed LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=203). Cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) measurement vs. Left ventricular systolic function parameters from DSCT-CA was evaluated on Correlation between CTR and LVEDVI in depressed LVEF group (r=0.66, p=<0.001). Cardiothoracic ratio correlated with left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (r=0.66) and ejection fraction (r=-0.46) in patients with depressed, but not preserved, ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: