Key result
Novel oral anticoagulants, left atrial appendage closure, and rhythm control strategies are reviewed as effective emerging alternatives to warfarin for reducing stroke risk in atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
What is the evidence for current and emerging therapies for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation?
What is the evidence for current and emerging therapies for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This review outlines the current and emerging pharmacological and procedural strategies for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation.
May support expanded AF stroke prophylaxis options beyond warfarin; leaves open need for updated comparative trials.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases risk of stroke fivefold. This is mainly due to cardioembolism of left atrial appendage thrombus to the cerebral circulation. Currently, the principal means of stroke prophylaxis is anticoagulation using warfarin, an oral vitamin K antagonist. However, owing to the risk of hemorrhage associated with warfarin, there is considerable interest in alternative means of stroke prophylaxis. This article summarizes the evidence that warfarin and recently developed novel oral anticoagulants (e.g., dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and tecarfarin) are effective for reducing stroke risk in AF patients. We also review the impact of newer approaches such as surgical and percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and AF-rhythm control strategies in reducing stroke risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2011) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Novel oral anticoagulants, left atrial appendage closure, and rhythm control vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Stroke risk. Novel oral anticoagulants, left atrial appendage closure, and rhythm control strategies are reviewed as effective emerging alternatives to warfarin for reducing stroke risk in atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: