Computational evaluation demonstrates 96.02% speaker verification accuracy in Australian English audio recordings, highlighting the forensic utility of pairwise deep learning models.
Forensic Voice Comparison (FVC) remains a critical yet challenging task in digital forensics, often hindered by manual subjectivity, background noise, and speaker variability. This paper presents a novel semi-automatic FVC framework based on Siamese Neural Networks (SNN), a discriminative metric-learning architecture combined with stationary noise reduction for robust voice similarity assessment. Proposed framework leverages the SNN’s ability to learn a shared embedding space where Euclidean distance reflects speaker identity. Using a jurisdiction-specific dataset of 3899 Australian English speech samples (FLAC format), proposed framework achieves 96.02% accuracy, 94.00% precision, and 92.10% recall in distinguishing same vs different speaker pairs. The proposed framework is evaluated against strong baselines including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), Gaussian Mixture Model-Universal Background Model (GMM-UBM), and validated via 5-fold cross-validation (mean ± std. dev.) to ensure statistical robustness. Proposed framework fills a critical gap in forensic phonetics by demonstrating that lightweight, interpretable, pairwise deep learning models can outperform complex generative or ensemble systems in real-world FVC scenarios. All preprocessing, training protocols, and hyperparameters are documented for reproducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kruthika et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: