Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Some researchers have concluded that, for children and adolescents, behavioral interventions may be more effective than nonbehavioral interventions. Other researchers, however, have proposed artifactual hypotheses for the apparent superiority of behavioral treatments. In this study, one such hypothesis was evaluated: that the apparent superiority of behavioral interventions among children is due to differences in the methodological quality of studies of behavioral and nonbehavioral treatments. Meta-analytic results reported in this article found little support for this hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiss et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: