Key result
Review finds the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale most used among 47 discharge readiness instruments.
Why the study?
Discharge readiness of adult hospital patients is an increasingly important multidimensional concept, but reviews of existing measurement instruments and theoretical concepts have been lacking.
This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of 47 instruments and 5 theoretical dimensions for assessing hospital discharge readiness in adult patients.
May guide clinicians' choice of discharge readiness tools; extends the literature by mapping 5 dimensions and 47 instruments.
Background: The Discharge Readiness of adult patients in a hospital setting is a multidimensional concept which is becoming increasingly important internationally as part of discharge planning. To date, there has been a lack of reviews of existing measurement instruments as well as theoretical concepts of discharge readiness. Objective: To provide an overview of existing measurement instruments and theoretical concepts regarding readiness for hospital discharge in adult patients. Design and methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological manual and PRISMA ScR reporting principles. A literature search was conducted using the CINAHL and LIVIVO databases (including MEDLINE and PSYINDEX) in October 2021. After test screening, all identified articles were screened by two independent reviewers using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria before the content was extracted and mapped. Results: Of the 1823 records identified, 107 were included in this review. Of these, 30 studies were included as development or validation studies of measurement instruments assessing discharge readiness, 68 were included as empirical studies with readiness for hospital discharge as the primary outcome or key concept, and nine publications were included as theoretical papers or reviews. Five dimensions of readiness for hospital discharge were extracted:1) Physical, 2) Psychological, 3) Education and Knowledge, 4) Adequate Individual Support, and 5) Social and Organisational Determinants. Of the 47 instruments identified for measuring discharge readiness, 33 were validated. The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) was the most frequently used instrument. Conclusions: The systematic measurement of readiness for hospital discharge, particularly from the patient's perspective combined with the nurse's perspective, might be useful in reducing negative outcomes such as readmissions. This review provides an overview of existing and validated instruments for the systematic assessment of discharge readiness in acute inpatient care, as well as an overview of the theoretical concepts of readiness for hospital discharge. Further research is needed on the relationship between organisational determinants and readiness for discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feldbusch et al. (2024) conducted a review in Hospital discharge readiness (n=107). Measurement instruments for discharge readiness was evaluated on Measurement instruments and theoretical concepts regarding readiness for hospital discharge. A scoping review of 107 records identified 5 dimensions of discharge readiness and 47 measurement instruments, with the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale being the most frequently used.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: