Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A TELEPHONE survey effectively screen for visual impairment?To what extent is a telephone sample representative of households where visual impairment is present ?Or, stated otherwise, will a telephone sample produce prevalence rates of visual impairment comparable to rates obtained by more tradi¬ tional sampling methods; for example, person¬ ally interviewing a sample of all households (telephone and nontelephone) as in the Na¬ tional Health Survey and most other health studies?Is there under-reporting of visual impairment in telephone screening as compared with face-to-face interviews?How much trust should be placed in what people say about their eye trouble?Can acceptable data on vis¬ ual acuity be obtained by nonmedical investi¬ gators conducting standardized vision tests in the homes of respondents ?These are the questions we sought to answer in a household survey of visual impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eric Josephson (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: