Key result
Combined benazepril and valsartan fails to delay microalbuminuria progression versus benazepril monotherapy.
Why the study?
ACE inhibitors and ARBs prevent microalbuminuria in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients, but whether combined therapy prevents microalbuminuria better than monotherapy was unknown.
Does combined therapy with benazepril and valsartan prevent progression to microalbuminuria better than benazepril or valsartan monotherapy in type 2 diabetic patients with high-normal albuminuria?
RCT (n=612)
Open-label, blinded endpoint
Randomized
Yes
Does combined therapy with benazepril and valsartan prevent progression to microalbuminuria better than benazepril or valsartan monotherapy in type 2 diabetic patients with high-normal albuminuria?
Effect estimate: Acceleration factor 1.410 (95% CI 0.806 to 2.467)
Absolute Event Rate: 27% vs 28.1%
p-value: p=0.229
Dual RAS blockade with benazepril and valsartan does not significantly improve prevention of microalbuminuria compared to monotherapy in type 2 diabetics, but increases the risk of hyperkalemia and hypotension.
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) prevent microalbuminuria in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients. We assessed whether combined therapy with the 2 medications may prevent microalbuminuria better than ACE inhibitor or ARB monotherapy. METHODS AND FINDINGS: VARIETY was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial evaluating whether, at similar blood pressure (BP) control, combined therapy with benazepril (10 mg/day) and valsartan (160 mg/day) would prevent microalbuminuria more effectively than benazepril (20 mg/day) or valsartan (320 mg/day) monotherapy in 612 type 2 diabetic patients with high-normal albuminuria included between July 2007 and April 2013 by the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS and 8 diabetology or nephrology units in Italy. Time to progression to microalbuminuria was the primary outcome. Analyses were intention to treat. Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. During a median [interquartile range, IQR] follow-up of 66 [42 to 83] months, 53 patients (27.0%) on combination therapy, 57 (28.1%) on benazepril, and 64 (31.8%) on valsartan reached microalbuminuria. Using an accelerated failure time model, the estimated acceleration factors were 1.410 (95% CI: 0.806 to 2.467, P = 0.229) for benazepril compared to combination therapy, 0.799 (95% CI: 0.422 to 1.514, P = 0.492) for benazepril compared to valsartan, and 1.665 (95% CI: 1.007 to 2.746, P = 0.047) for valsartan compared to combination therapy. Between-group differences in estimated acceleration factors were nonsignificant after adjustment for predefined confounders. BP control was similar across groups. All treatments were safe and tolerated well, with a slight excess of hyperkalemia and hypotension in the combination therapy group. The main study limitation was the lower than expected albuminuria at inclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Risk/benefit profile of study treatments was similar. Dual renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade is not recommended as compared to benazepril or valsartan monotherapy for prevention of microalbuminuria in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2006-005954-62; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00503152.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruggenenti et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes with high-normal albuminuria (n=612). Benazepril and valsartan combination therapy vs. Benazepril (20 mg/day) or valsartan (320 mg/day) monotherapy was evaluated on Time to progression to microalbuminuria (Acceleration factor 1.410, 95% CI 0.806 to 2.467, p=0.229). Combined therapy with benazepril and valsartan did not significantly delay progression to microalbuminuria compared to benazepril monotherapy (acceleration factor 1.410; 95% CI 0.806-2.467; P=0.229).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: