Aims To determine the patterns and predictors of treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes on ≥2 non‐insulin antidiabetic drugs ( NIAD s) and inadequate glycaemic control in primary care in C atalonia, S pain. Material and Methods This was a retrospective analysis using electronic medical records from patients with HbA1c ≥ 7% and a first prescription for a new NIAD or insulin recorded from J anuary 2010 to D ecember 2014. Therapeutic inertia was defined as no intensification if HbA1c was ≥8% at baseline or during follow‐up. Time to first intensification was evaluated by time‐to‐event analysis, and factors predicting intensification through a competing‐risk regression model. Results Among 23 678 patients with HbA1c ≥ 7%, 26.2% were censored without treatment intensification after a median follow up of 4.2 years. Among the 12 730 patients in the subgroup with HbA1c ≥ 8% at baseline or during follow‐up, therapeutic inertia was present in 18.1% of cases. In the overall cohort, mean HbA1c at initiation of insulin and NIAD were 9.4% ± 1.5% and 8.7% ± 1.3%, respectively. Median time to first intensification was 17.1 months in patients with HbA1c 8.0% to 9.9%, and 10.1 months in those with HbA1c > 10%. Variables strongly associated with intensification were HbA1c values 8.0% to 9.9% (subhazard ratio [ SHR ], 1.7; 95% CI , 1.65‐1.78) and >10% ( SHR , 2.5; 95% CI , 2.37‐2.68); diabetes duration ≥20 years ( SHR , 1.25; 95% CI , 1.11‐1.41) and, to a lesser extent, female gender, presence of comorbidities, chronic kidney disease and microvascular complications. Conclusions Intensification was not undertaken in 1 in 5 patients. Both HbA1c thresholds and time until therapy intensification exceeded current recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mata‐Cases et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: