Key result
An algorithm combining ECG and accelerometer data from a chest patch estimated respiratory rate with a mean absolute error of 1.02 to 2.03 breaths per minute compared to a reference device.
Why the study?
Does an algorithm combining ECG and accelerometer data accurately estimate respiratory rate compared to a reference device in elderly subjects?
Does an algorithm combining ECG and accelerometer data accurately estimate respiratory rate compared to a reference device in elderly subjects?
An algorithm combining ECG and accelerometer data from a chest patch sensor provides accurate respiratory rate estimation during various activities in elderly subjects.
May support wearable respiratory monitoring in elderly; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger validation trials.
Continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in ambulatory conditions has widespread applications for screening of respiratory diseases and remote patient monitoring. Unfortunately, minimally obtrusive techniques often suffer from low accuracy. In this paper, we describe an algorithm with low computational complexity for combining multiple respiratory measurements to estimate breathing rate from an unobtrusive chest patch sensor. Respiratory rates derived from the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and modulation of the QRS amplitude of electrocardiography (ECG) are combined with a respiratory rate derived from tri-axial accelerometer data. The three respiration rates are combined by a weighted average using weights based on quality metrics for each signal. The algorithm was evaluated on 15 elderly subjects who performed spontaneous and metronome breathing as well as a variety of activities of daily living (ADLs). When compared to a reference device, the mean absolute error was 1.02 breaths per minute (BrPM) during metronome breathing, 1.67 BrPM during spontaneous breathing, and 2.03 BrPM during ADLs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2013) studied this question. Algorithm combining ECG and tri-axial accelerometer data vs. Reference device was evaluated on Mean absolute error of respiratory rate estimation. An algorithm combining ECG and accelerometer data from a chest patch estimated respiratory rate with a mean absolute error of 1.02 to 2.03 breaths per minute compared to a reference device.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: