Key result
High pulse wave velocity links to ~28% higher mortality and predicts incident frailty and disability.
Why the study?
Data are lacking on the association between arterial stiffness and frailty, disability, and mortality in the older population.
Does increased pulse wave velocity predict frailty, disability, and mortality in community-dwelling older adults?
Cohort (n=978)
Does increased pulse wave velocity predict frailty, disability, and mortality in community-dwelling older adults?
Arterial stiffness, measured by pulse wave velocity, is a significant predictor of frailty, disability, and mortality in older adults without diabetes, with different severity thresholds for each outcome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PWV thresholds may aid risk stratification in older adults; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background: Arterial stiffness leads to several adverse events in the older population, but there is a lack of data on its association with frailty, disability, and mortality in the same population. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of arterial stiffness in the loss of functional ability (frailty and disability) and mortality. Methods: Data were taken from community-dwelling aged 65 years participants without diabetes in the Toledo Study of Healthy Ageing cohort. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), assessed through SphygmoCor, was recorded at baseline. Median follow-up time were 2.99 years for frailty (frailty phenotype [FP] and Frailty Trait Scale-5 [FTS5]) and disability (Katz Index) and 6.2 for mortality. Logistic regressions models were built for disability and frailty and Cox proportional hazards model for death, adjusted by age and sex, comorbidity, cardiovascular risk factors, asymmetric dimethylarginine levels, and polypharmacy. Results: Overall, 978 (mean age 74.5 ± 5.6 years, 56.7% female) participants were included. Different cut-off points were shown for each outcome. PWV >11.5 m/s was cross-sectionally associated with frailty (FP: OR fully-adjusted model: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.45-1.97; FTS5: OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22-1.87) and disability (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.26-1.79); PWV >10 m/s with incident frailty by FP (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.10-1.68) and FTS5 (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.12-1.75), and PWV >11 m/s with death (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.50). For incident (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.55) and worsening disability (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.45) the threshold was 12.5 m/s. Below these cut-off points, age was the best predictor of adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Arterial stiffness predicts frailty, disability, and mortality in older people, with different cut-off points, ie,severity degrees, for each of the assessed outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Álvarez‐Bustos et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Community-dwelling older adults (n=978). Pulse wave velocity (PWV) vs. Lower PWV (below cut-off points) was evaluated on Mortality (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.50). Pulse wave velocity >11 m/s was associated with increased mortality, while thresholds of >10 m/s and >12.5 m/s predicted incident frailty and disability, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: