Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 9, 2013BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingOpen Access

Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JGJean-François GehannoNormandie UniversitéLRLætitia RollinNormandie UniversitéSDStéfan DarmoniNormandie Université

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Gehanno et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e24477a57fdc4e227af73https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-7
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Where you search is what you get: literature mining – G oogle S cholar versus W eb of S cience using a data set from a literature search in vegetation science2012 · 33 citations
  2. 2Assessment of bibliographic databases performance in information retrieval for occupational and environmental toxicology.1998 · 48 citations
  3. 3A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials2002 · 116 citations
  4. 4Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey2004 · 428 citations
  5. 5Searching the right database. A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals1999 · 86 citations