January 1, 1998

Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

(1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica: Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 224-229.

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Per O. Seglen (Thu,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e24e31d0a44496ac82e53 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809000920

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Sense and nonsense about the impact factor1997 · 295 citations
2The metre and the pendulum1990 · 2 citations
3THE LAW OF CONSTANT CITATION FOR SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE1968 · 19 citations
4Relationships between the rate of scientific development and citations. The chance for citedness model1996 · 21 citations
5A critical analysis of the journal impact factors ofAngewandte Chemie and the journal of the American Chemical Society inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only1996 · 72 citations

AI에게 질문

Bookmark