Key result
Integrated surgery-medicine care linked to ~18% higher rate of non-surgical treatment in older patients.
Why the study?
There is growing evidence regarding the benefits of integrated models of care between surgeons and physicians in non-orthopaedic surgery.
Does an integrated General Surgery/General Medicine care model improve goals of care documentation, complications, mortality, and length of stay in emergency general surgery patients aged 75 years and older?
Observational (n=549)
Does an integrated General Surgery/General Medicine care model improve goals of care documentation, complications, mortality, and length of stay in emergency general surgery patients aged 75 years and older?
Absolute Event Rate: 69% vs 58.5%
An integrated care model between general surgery and general medicine for older emergency surgical patients improves goals of care documentation and increases non-surgical management without worsening complications or mortality.
May encourage integrated care models to facilitate non-operative management in older patients; leaves open effects on outcomes in randomized trials.
BACKGROUNDS: There is growing evidence on the benefits of integrated models of care between surgeons and physicians in non-orthopaedic surgery. We implemented a new General Surgery/General Medicine care model, for all emergency General Surgery patients aged 75 years and older. We compared rates of goals of care (GOC) documentation, hospital-acquired complications (HAC), mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: This is a non-randomized trial, with data collected prospectively in phase 1 (2021-2022), where patients received the traditional standard of care (case-by-case referral to a General Physician), and in phase 2 (2022-2023) where patients received integrated care. Variables were compared between phase 1 and phase 2 using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-nine patients, 188 in phase 1 and 361 in phase 2, participated in the study. On univariate analysis, there was a significant increase in patients treated non-surgically in phase 2 (58.5% vs. 69.0%). Patients treated non-surgically had significantly shorter LOS, experienced less HACs (P < 0.001). Other variables did not significantly differ after implementation of the service. The multivariate GLM revealed a significant reduction in admissions with undocumented GOC in phase 2 (P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: This study showed that an integrated care model resulted in a greater proportion of patients being treated non-surgically with a comparable rate of HAC and mortality, as well as better documentation of patients' GOC. As the number of older surgical patients will continue to rise, the call for such service to become standard of care in non-orthopaedic surgery is pressing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrah et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Emergency General Surgery (n=549). Integrated General Surgery/General Medicine care model vs. Traditional standard of care (case-by-case referral to a General Physician) was evaluated on Proportion of patients treated non-surgically. An integrated General Surgery/General Medicine care model for older surgical patients significantly increased the proportion of patients treated non-surgically (69.0% vs. 58.5%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: