PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 31, 2025Internal Medicine Journal2 citations

What do general medicine perioperative services do? A Victorian multicentre cross‐sectional study

View Full Paper
AAAr Kar AungRGRajesh GounderEPEldho Paul

Key Result

A proactive model of general medicine perioperative care was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of MET calls, referrals to other subspecialties, and take-over of care.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=1,071)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does a proactive model of perioperative care improve clinical outcomes in adult surgical patients referred to general medicine?

P
Population
1,071 adult surgical patient referrals to general medicine perioperative services across 11 Victorian public hospitals.
E
Exposure
Proactive model of perioperative care
C
Comparator
Other models of perioperative care
O
Outcome
Clinical outcomes including medical emergency team (MET) responses, length of stay, referrals to other subspecialties, take-over of care, and returning to usual residence

Proactive models of general medicine perioperative care may improve clinical outcomes such as reducing MET calls and take-over of care in high-risk surgical patients.

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the models of general medicine perioperative services and describe the characteristics and outcomes of perioperative referrals. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional study involving 11 Victorian public hospitals was conducted over 6 weeks at each site. Adult patient (≥18 years old) referrals from all surgical services were included. Comparative analyses of outcomes based on models of care were undertaken and adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: The overall service activity was 427 (95% CI: 403-453) referrals per 10 000 surgical admissions per year. Of 1071 referrals, 922 (86.1%) were inpatients and 759 (70.9%) were emergency instances. Median age was 73 (62-83) years and 45.5% were females. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5 (3-6) and clinical frailty scale was 4 (3-5). The most common referral requests were for preoperative risk assessment and optimisation, management of postoperative medical complications and diagnostic input. Clinical outcomes included 43 (4.3%) deaths, 73 (7.9%) medical emergency team (MET) responses and 32 (3.5%) intensive care admissions within 48 h and 116 (11.6%) take-over of care instances. Proactive model of care was significantly associated with fewer MET calls, shorter length of stay, fewer referrals to other subspecialties and take-over of care and higher rates of returning to usual residence. Lower likelihood of MET calls, referral to other subspecialties and take-over of care remained statistically significant in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: General medicine perioperative services provide care to older, co-morbid, frail and high-risk surgical patients across all perioperative settings. General physicians' role in perioperative care is diverse and wide-ranging. Well-resourced proactive models of perioperative care may confer better outcomes for patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aung et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Surgical patients requiring perioperative care (n=1,071). Proactive model of care vs. Other models of care was evaluated on Clinical outcomes including MET calls, length of stay, referrals to other subspecialties, and take-over of care. A proactive model of general medicine perioperative care was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of MET calls, referrals to other subspecialties, and take-over of care.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa2c9e7126a7742c020717dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70243
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper