This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A microwave cavity and heating system for microwave processing and in situ dynamic measurements of the complex permittivity of dielectric materials at high temperatures ( <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">~ 1000\ ∘C</tex></formula> ) has been developed. The method is based on a dual-mode cylindrical cavity where heating and testing are performed by two different swept frequency microwave sources. A cross-coupling filter isolates the signals coming from both sources. By adjusting the frequency bandwidth of the heating source and the level of coupling to the cavity, an automatic procedure allows for the establishment of a desirable level of heating rate to the dielectric sample to reach high temperatures in short cycles. Dielectric properties of materials as a function of temperature are calculated by an improved cavity perturbation method during heating. Accuracy of complex permittivity results has been evaluated and an error lower than 5% with respect to a rigorous analysis of the cavity has been achieved. The functionality of the microwave dielectric measurement system has been demonstrated by heating and measuring glass and ceramic samples up to <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">1000\ ∘C</tex> </formula> . The correlation of the complex permittivity with the heating rate, temperature, absorbed power, and other processing parameters can help to better understand the interactions that take place during microwave heating of materials at high temperatures compared to conventional heating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catalá‐Civera et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: