Key result
Computerized treatment suggestions failed to significantly improve suggestion compliance (25%-35% vs 26% control; p=0.13) or generic health-related quality of life in uncomplicated hypertension.
Why the study?
The effects of evidence-based hypertension treatment suggestions delivered to physicians and pharmacists via a comprehensive electronic medical record system on outpatient health outcomes required assessment.
Do computerized evidence-based treatment suggestions made to physicians and pharmacists improve generic health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension?
RCT (n=712)
2 times 2 factorial design
No
Do computerized evidence-based treatment suggestions made to physicians and pharmacists improve generic health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Displaying computerized evidence-based treatment suggestions to physicians and pharmacists via an electronic medical record system did not improve adherence to treatment recommendations, blood pressure control, or quality of life in outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension.
Study Objective. To assess the effects of evidence‐based treatment suggestions for hypertension made to physicians and pharmacists using a comprehensive electronic medical record system. Design. Randomized controlled trial with a 2 times 2 factorial design of physician and pharmacist interventions, which resulted in four groups of patients: physician intervention only, pharmacist intervention only, intervention by physician and pharmacist, and intervention by neither physician nor pharmacist (control). Setting. Academic primary care internal medicine practice. Subjects. Seven hundred twelve patients with uncomplicated hypertension. Measurements and Main Results. Suggestions were displayed to physicians on computer workstations used to write outpatient orders and to pharmacists when filling prescriptions. The primary end point was generic health‐related quality of life. Secondary end points were symptom profile and side effects from antihypertensive drugs, number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, blood pressure measurements, patient satisfaction with physicians and pharmacists, drug therapy compliance, and health care charges. In the control group, implementation of care changes in accordance with treatment suggestions was observed in 26% of patients. In the intervention groups, compliance with suggestions was poor, with treatment suggestions implemented in 25% of patients for whom suggestions were displayed only to pharmacists, 29% of those for whom suggestions were displayed only to physicians, and 35% of the group for whom both physicians and pharmacists received suggestions (p=0.13). Intergroup differences were neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant for generic health‐related quality of life, symptom and side‐effect profiles, number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, blood pressure measurements, charges, or drug therapy compliance. Conclusion. Computer‐based intervention using a sophisticated electronic physician order‐entry system failed to improve compliance with treatment suggestions or outcomes of patients with uncomplicated hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murray et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Uncomplicated hypertension (n=712). Computerized evidence-based treatment suggestions displayed to physicians only, pharmacists only, or both vs. Intervention by neither physician nor pharmacist (control) was evaluated on Generic health-related quality of life. Computerized treatment suggestions failed to significantly improve suggestion compliance (25%-35% vs 26% control; p=0.13) or generic health-related quality of life in uncomplicated hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: