Why the study?
The benefit-to-harm ratio of PSA-based prostate cancer screening may be improved by reference ranges accounting for individual characteristics, prompting evaluation of factors influencing PSA levels.
How do PSA levels vary by age, BMI, race/ethnicity, and genetic risk among men eligible for prostate cancer screening?
How do PSA levels vary by age, BMI, race/ethnicity, and genetic risk among men eligible for prostate cancer screening?
PSA levels vary significantly by age, BMI, and polygenic risk scores, suggesting that tailoring PSA reference ranges based on these endogenous factors could improve the benefit-to-harm ratio of prostate cancer screening.
Supports age-, BMI-, and PRS-specific PSA thresholds; leaves open effects on screening outcomes.
Background: The benefit-to-harm ratio of PSA-based prostate cancer screening may be improved through implementation of PSA reference ranges that consider innate individual characteristics. We evaluated variation in PSA levels by factors that may influence PSA levels among men eligible to undergo prostate cancer screening. Methods: We identified men ages 40 to 79 years in the All of Us Research Program who had no history of prostate cancer or elevated PSA at cohort enrollment. PSA distributions were compared across age groups, self-identified race or ethnicity (SIRE), body mass index (BMI), polygenic risk score (PRS) for prostate cancer risk, and PRS for PSA level. Multivariable associations between these factors and PSA percentiles were evaluated using quantile regression. Results: Among 13,749 eligible men, 95th percentiles (p95) of PSA values increased with age (40–49 years: 1.81 ng/mL, 50–59 years: 3.23 ng/mL, 60–69 years: 4.15 ng/mL, and 70–79 years: 5.53 ng/mL). p95 of PSA was 0.83 ng/mL lower [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44–0.1.22] among participants with BMI 35 to 39 kg/m2 versus <25 kg/m2. p95 of PSA was 2.32 ng/mL higher (95% CI, 1.20–3.44) among those with PRS for prostate cancer >90th percentile versus ≤50th percentile and 1.21 ng/mL higher (95% CI, 0.50–1.92) among males with PRS for PSA >90th percentile versus ≤50th percentile. SIRE was not consistently associated with PSA levels. Conclusions: PSA levels vary by age, BMI, and PRS but not SIRE. Further work is needed to understand how tailoring PSA reference ranges based on these characteristics would affect screening outcomes. Impact: Consideration of factors that endogenously influence PSA levels may lead to improved benefit-to-harm ratios of prostate cancer screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kensler et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: