Key result
Right minithoracotomy linked to ~90% lower 1-year ATA recurrence vs sternotomy during mitral and maze surgery.
Why the study?
Little is known regarding whether long-term rhythm and survival outcomes are affected by a right minithoracotomy approach compared with traditional median sternotomy for concomitant Cox maze IV procedure and mitral valve surgery.
Does a right minithoracotomy approach improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing concomitant Cox maze IV procedure and mitral valve surgery compared to median sternotomy?
Cohort (n=377)
Does a right minithoracotomy approach improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing concomitant Cox maze IV procedure and mitral valve surgery compared to median sternotomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 99% vs 90%
p-value: p=0.001
Right minithoracotomy for concomitant mitral valve surgery and Cox maze procedure is associated with improved early freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias and reduced perioperative morbidity compared to median sternotomy.
May support right minithoracotomy in select patients; leaves open confirmation via randomized trials before practice change.
Objective: A right minithoracotomy (RMT) is a minimally invasive surgical approach that has been increasingly performed for the concomitant Cox maze IV procedure (CMP) and mitral valve surgery (MVS). Little is known regarding whether long-term rhythm and survival outcomes are affected by the RMT as compared with the traditional median sternotomy (MS) approach. Methods: Between April 2004 and April 2021, 377 patients underwent the concomitant CMP and MVS, of whom 38% had RMT. Propensity score matching yielded 116 pairs. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) was assessed with prolonged monitoring annually for 8 years. Survival, rhythm, and perioperative outcomes were compared. Results: The unmatched RMT cohort had a greater freedom from ATA recurrence at 1 year (99% vs 90%, P = 0.001) and 3 years (94% vs 86%, P = 0.045). The matched RMT cohort had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (median: 215 [199 to 253] vs 170 [136 to 198] min, P < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp (110 [98 to 124] vs 86 [71 to 102] min, P < 0.001) times but shorter intensive care time (48 [24 to 95] vs 71 [26 to 144] h, P = 0.001) and length of stay (8 [6 to 11] vs 10 [7 to 14] h, P < 0.001). More pacemakers (18% vs 4%, P < 0.001) and postoperative transfusions (57% vs 41%, P = 0.014) occurred in the MS cohort. The 30-day mortality ( P = 0.651) and 8-year survival ( P = 0.072) was not significantly different between the cohorts. Conclusions: Early 1-year and 3-year freedom from ATA recurrence was better in the RMT cohort compared with the MS cohort. Despite longer operative times, the RMT cohort had shorter lengths of stay, fewer postoperative transfusions, and fewer pacemakers placed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yates et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Concomitant Cox maze IV procedure and mitral valve surgery (n=377). Right minithoracotomy (RMT) vs. Median sternotomy (MS) was evaluated on Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) recurrence at 1 year (p=0.001). Right minithoracotomy for concomitant Cox maze IV and mitral valve surgery was associated with greater 1-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to median sternotomy (99% vs 90%, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: