Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Changes in winter precipitation accompanying emerging climate trends lead to a major carbon-climate feedback from Arctic tundra. However, the mechanisms driving the direction, magnitude, and form (CO 2 and CH 4 ) of C fluxes and derived climate forcing (i.e. GWP, global warming potential) from Arctic tundra under future precipitation scenarios remain unresolved. Here, we investigated the impacts of 18 years of shallow (SS, −15–30 %) and deeper (IS, +20–45 %; DS, +70–100 %) snow depth on ecosystem C fluxes and GWP in moist acidic tundra over the growing season. The response of Arctic tundra C fluxes to snow accumulation was markedly non-linear. Both shallow- and deeper- winter snow decreased Arctic tundra CO 2 emissions relative to ambient (AS), ultimately reducing ecosystem C losses over the growing season. Gross primary productivity (GPP) increased with moderate increases in snow depth and decreased with further snow accumulation closely following transitions in shrub abundance. Photosynthetic uptake, however, was tightly regulated by canopy structure and plant respiration (R aut ) to GPP ratio was highly conserved despite substantial transformations of plant community across snow treatments revealing a prominent role of heterotrophic respiration (R het ) in driving net ecosystem exchange. Consistently, ecosystem C gains responded to constraints on R het by temperature limitation within colder soils at SS, and by snow- and thaw-induced increases in soil-water content (SWC) that promoted anaerobic decomposition and dampened the temperature sensitivity of R het at IS and DS. Greater CH 4 emissions from wetter soils, however, increased the global warming potential (GWP) of Arctic tundra emissions at IS and DS despite decreases in C losses. Overall, our findings indicate the potential of Arctic tussock tundra to reduce C losses over the growing season but also to significantly contribute to the ecosystem GWP under emerging trends in winter precipitation. • Non-linear response of net C flux to snow: shallower and deeper snow depth reduce C losses from arctic tundra. • Snow depth reshapes plant community, but CO 2 uptake is constrained by canopy structure. • Reduced microbial respiration rather than enhanced plant productivity drives C sink with snow depth. • Rhet limited by temperature and SWC rather accelerated by warming or thaw-induced C availability. • CH 4 emissions amplify the GWP despite reduced C losses with deeper snow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blanc‐Betes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: