Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the comparative diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography and transoesophageal echocardiography for detecting infective endocarditis.
Does cardiac computed tomography improve diagnostic accuracy compared to transoesophageal echocardiography for detecting infective endocarditis complications in patients with suspected or confirmed infective endocarditis?
Meta-Analysis
Does cardiac computed tomography improve diagnostic accuracy compared to transoesophageal echocardiography for detecting infective endocarditis complications in patients with suspected or confirmed infective endocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.88% vs 0.74%
p-value: p=0.015
Cardiac CT is superior to TEE for detecting periannular abscesses, whereas TEE is superior for detecting vegetations, suggesting a complementary role for both modalities in the evaluation of infective endocarditis.
Supports complementary CT and TEE use in infective endocarditis; extends prior data with pooled sensitivity comparisons.
Objective: To investigate the comparative diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography (CT) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for detecting infective endocarditis. Methods: Original publications published in English language before July, 2021 were thoroughly search in PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google Scholar literature databases. Studies were included if they used CT and/or TEE as an index test, presented data on valvular complications related to infective endocarditis, and used surgical findings as to the reference standard. Results: Literature screening identified fifteen studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that CT sensitivity for detecting valvular abscesses was higher than that of TEE [0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82 to 0.94; 11 studies involving 842 subjects) versus 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.84) P = 0.015; 12 studies involving 917 subjects]. TEE showed statistically significantly greater sensitivity than CT for detecting valvular vegetation [0.91 (95% CI: 0.84 to 0.97, 11 studies involving 971 subjects) versus 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.82), 12 studies involving 915 subjects, P =0.019. In case of leaflet detection, TEE showed statistically significantly higher sensitivity than CT (0.76 vs 0.46, P =0.010). Conclusion: CT performs statistically significantly better than TEE for detecting abscesses while TEE provides statistically significant superior results for detecting vegetation. There is a need for well-designed prospective studies to further corroborate these findings. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.3.5139 How to cite this:Jing L, Song Y. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography vs transoesophageal echocardiography for infective endocarditis − A meta-analysis . Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(3):736-742. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.3.5139 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Infective endocarditis. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) vs. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Sensitivity for detecting valvular abscesses (p=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: