Key result
Bystander CPR rates drive wide regional disparities in sports-related sudden cardiac arrest survival, up to ~43%.
Why the study?
Characteristics of sudden cardiac arrest during sports provide a novel setting to assess factors associated with regional disparities in outcomes, which remain unexplored.
Does bystander initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve survival at hospital discharge in individuals experiencing sudden cardiac arrest during sports?
Observational (n=820)
Yes
Does bystander initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve survival at hospital discharge in individuals experiencing sudden cardiac arrest during sports?
p-value: p=<0.001
There are major regional disparities in survival after sports-related sudden cardiac arrest, which are strongly driven by differences in the rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Bystander CPR rates may explain regional survival disparities after sports-related SCA; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
AIMS: Characteristics of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) during sports offers a novel (and unexplored) setting to assess factors associated with disparities in outcomes across regions. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a prospective 5-year community-based French registry concerning SCA during sports in 10-75 year-olds, we evaluated whether outcomes differed significantly between geographic regions. We then determined the extent to which variations in community-related early interventions were associated with regional variations in survival. Among 820 SCA cases studied, overall survival at hospital discharge was 15.7% (95% confidence interval, 13.2-18.2%), with considerable regional disparities (from 3.4 to 42.6%, P < 0.001). Major differences were noted regarding bystander initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (15.3-80.9%, P < 0.001) and presence of initial shockable rhythm (28.6-79.1%, P < 0.001), with higher values of these being associated with better survival rates. The proportion of survivors with favourable neurological outcome at discharge was fairly uniform among survival groups (CPC-1/2, varying from 77.4 to 90.0%, P = 0.83). No difference was observed regarding subjects' characteristics and circumstances of SCA occurrence, including delays in resuscitation (collapse-to-call period). With a comparable in-hospital mortality (P = 0.44), survival at hospital discharge was highly correlated with that at hospital admission (regional variations from 7.4 to 75.0%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Major regional disparities exist in survival rates (up to 10-fold) after SCA during sports. SCA cases from regions with the highest levels of bystander resuscitation had the best survival rates to hospital admission and discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marijon et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Sudden cardiac arrest during sports (n=820). Geographic regions showed major disparities in survival to hospital discharge (3.4% to 42.6%, P<0.001) after sports-related sudden cardiac arrest, driven by bystander resuscitation rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: