Key result
Five-minute app-based biofeedback breathing improves HRV during stress recovery versus mindfulness or control.
Why the study?
Stress recovery predicts cardiovascular health, but the effectiveness of a brief app-based breathing intervention (BioBase) in enhancing physiological recovery after stress among employees remained to be determined.
Does a brief app-based biofeedback breathing intervention improve heart rate variability recovery following stress induction in full-time employees?
RCT (n=75)
randomized
Does a brief app-based biofeedback breathing intervention improve heart rate variability recovery following stress induction in full-time employees?
A brief, 5-minute app-based biofeedback breathing intervention significantly improved physiological recovery (measured by HRV) following acute stress in healthy employees.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports brief app-based biofeedback breathing to enhance post-stress HRV recovery in employees; extends RCT evidence for accessible digital interventions.
Background Recovery from stress is a predictive factor for cardiovascular health, and heart rate variability (HRV) is suggested to be an index of how well people physiologically recover from stress. Biofeedback and mindfulness interventions that include guided breathing have been shown to be effective in increasing HRV and facilitating stress recovery. Objective This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a brief app-based breathing intervention (BioBase) in enhancing physiological recovery among employees who were induced to cognitive and emotional stress. Methods In total, we recruited 75 full-time employees. Interbeat (RR) intervals were recorded continuously for 5 min at baseline and during cognitive and emotional stress induction. The session ended with a 5-min recovery period during which participants were randomly allocated into 3 conditions: app-based breathing (BioBase), mindfulness body scan, or control. Subjective tension was assessed at the end of each period. Results Subjective tension significantly increased following stress induction. HRV significantly decreased following the stress period. In the recovery phase, the root mean square of successive RR interval differences (P=.002), the percentage of successive RR intervals that differed by >50 ms (P=.008), and high frequency (P=.01) were significantly higher in the BioBase breathing condition than in the mindfulness body scan and the control groups. Conclusions Biofeedback breathing interventions digitally delivered through a commercially available app can be effective in facilitating stress recovery among employees. These findings contribute to the mobile health literature on the beneficial effects of brief app-based breathing interventions on employees’ cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chelidoni et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Stress (n=75). App-based breathing (BioBase) vs. Mindfulness body scan or control was evaluated on Heart rate variability (root mean square of successive RR interval differences) (p=0.002). A brief 5-minute app-based biofeedback breathing intervention significantly improved heart rate variability metrics during stress recovery compared to mindfulness body scan or control (RMSSD P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: