Key result
App-based breathing increases HRV during stress recovery versus mindfulness and control.
Why the study?
Recovery from stress is a predictive factor for cardiovascular health, and the effectiveness of brief app-based biofeedback breathing interventions in enhancing physiological stress recovery was assessed.
Does a brief app-based biofeedback breathing intervention improve physiological stress recovery in full-time employees?
RCT (n=75)
randomly allocated
Does a brief app-based biofeedback breathing intervention improve physiological stress recovery in full-time employees?
p-value: P=.002, P=.008, P=.01
A brief, app-based biofeedback breathing intervention significantly improves physiological markers of stress recovery (HRV) in employees compared to mindfulness or control.
Supports app-based breathing for employee stress recovery; extends biofeedback evidence to digital formats in working adults.
BACKGROUND Recovery from stress is a predictive factor for cardiovascular health, and heart rate variability (HRV) is suggested to be an index of how well people physiologically recover from stress. Biofeedback and mindfulness interventions that include guided breathing have been shown to be effective in increasing HRV and facilitating stress recovery. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a brief app-based breathing intervention (BioBase) in enhancing physiological recovery among employees who were induced to cognitive and emotional stress. METHODS In total, we recruited 75 full-time employees. Interbeat (RR) intervals were recorded continuously for 5 min at baseline and during cognitive and emotional stress induction. The session ended with a 5-min recovery period during which participants were randomly allocated into 3 conditions: app-based breathing (BioBase), mindfulness body scan, or control. Subjective tension was assessed at the end of each period. RESULTS Subjective tension significantly increased following stress induction. HRV significantly decreased following the stress period. In the recovery phase, the root mean square of successive RR interval differences (P=.002), the percentage of successive RR intervals that differed by >50 ms (P=.008), and high frequency (P=.01) were significantly higher in the BioBase breathing condition than in the mindfulness body scan and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS Biofeedback breathing interventions digitally delivered through a commercially available app can be effective in facilitating stress recovery among employees. These findings contribute to the mobile health literature on the beneficial effects of brief app-based breathing interventions on employees’ cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chelidoni et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in cognitive and emotional stress (n=75). app-based breathing (BioBase) vs. mindfulness body scan or control was evaluated on heart rate variability (root mean square of successive RR interval differences, percentage of successive RR intervals >50 ms, and high frequency) (p=P=.002, P=.008, P=.01). App-based breathing (BioBase) significantly increased heart rate variability metrics (RMSSD, P=.002; pNN50, P=.008; HF, P=.01) during stress recovery compared to mindfulness body scan and control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: