Key result
Non-VA MI treatment is linked to ~3-fold higher odds of omitting secondary prevention medications vs VA hospitals.
Why the study?
Fragmentation of health care across systems can contribute to mistakes in prescribing and filling medications among patients treated for myocardial infarction.
Does treatment at non-VA hospitals compared to VA hospitals increase omissions, duplications, and delays in secondary prevention medications among veterans aged 65 years or older hospitalized for myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=118,456)
Yes
Does treatment at non-VA hospitals compared to VA hospitals increase omissions, duplications, and delays in secondary prevention medications among veterans aged 65 years or older hospitalized for myocardial infarction?
Veterans treated for myocardial infarction at non-VA hospitals experience significantly more omissions, duplications, and delays in secondary prevention medications compared to those treated at VA hospitals, highlighting the need for improved care transitions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May indicate care transition gaps for veterans post-MI outside VA; extends prior evidence on medication continuity but remains hypothesis-generating.
INTRODUCTION: Fragmentation of health care across systems can contribute to mistakes in prescribing and filling medications among patients treated for myocardial infarction (MI). We sought to compare omissions, duplications, and delays in outpatient medications used for secondary prevention among veterans treated for MI at Veterans Affairs (VA) versus non-VA hospitals. METHODS: We utilized national VA and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data (2012-2018) to identify veterans 65 years or older hospitalized for MI and measured the use of outpatient medications for secondary prevention in the 30 days after MI among those treated at VA versus non-VA hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 118,456 veterans experiencing MI were included; of which 102,209 were hospitalized at non-VA hospitals. An omission in any medication class occurred more frequently among veterans treated at non-VA versus VA hospitals (82.8% vs 67.8%, P < 0.001). In multivariable modeling, the odds of omissions in any medication class were higher among those treated at non-VA versus VA hospitals (odds ratio: 3.04; 95% CI: 2.88-3.20). Duplications occurred more frequently in veterans treated at non-VA versus VA hospitals: 1.9% versus 1.6% had 1 or more for non-VA versus VA hospitals ( P < 0.001). Veterans treated at non-VA hospitals were more likely to have delays of 3 days or more in prescription fills after hospital discharge (88.4% vs 70.6% across all classes, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Omissions, duplications, and delays in outpatient prescribing of secondary prevention medications were more common among 118,456 veterans treated at non-VA versus VA hospitals for MI. Interventions aimed at improving care transitions and optimizing medication use among veterans treated at non-VA hospitals should be implemented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weeda et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=118,456). Treatment at non-VA hospitals vs. Treatment at VA hospitals was evaluated on Omission in any medication class for secondary prevention (OR 3.04, 95% CI 2.88-3.20, p=<0.001). Treatment at non-VA hospitals for MI was associated with higher odds of omissions in secondary prevention medications compared to VA hospitals (82.8% vs 67.8%; OR 3.04; 95% CI 2.88-3.20).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: