Key result
Initiating 3 to 4 secondary prevention drugs after AMI linked to ~26% lower 90-day mortality in frail elders.
Why the study?
Secondary prevention medications are often underprescribed in frail older adults following acute myocardial infarction due to absent data, perceived lack of benefit, and safety concerns.
Does the initiation of more secondary prevention medications reduce mortality in frail older adults after acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=4,787)
Yes
Does the initiation of more secondary prevention medications reduce mortality in frail older adults after acute myocardial infarction?
Odds Ratio: 0.74 (95% CI 0.57–0.97)
Using more guideline-recommended secondary prevention medications after myocardial infarction is associated with a survival benefit in frail, older adults, supporting their use for patients wishing to maximize longevity.
May support considering 3-4 medications to lower short-term mortality in frail post-MI residents; extends prior observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Background Secondary prevention medications are often not prescribed to frail, older adults following acute myocardial infarction, potentially because of the absence of data to support use, perceived lack of benefit, and concern over possible harms. We examined the effect of using more guideline-recommended medications after myocardial infarction on mortality, rehospitalization, and functional decline in the frailest and oldest segment of the US population-long-stay nursing home residents. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective cohort study of nursing home residents aged ≥65 years using 2007 to 2010 national US Minimum Data Set clinical assessment data and Medicare claims. Exposure was the number of secondary prevention medications (antiplatelets, β-blockers, statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors) initiated after myocardial infarction. Outcomes were 90-day death, rehospitalization, and functional decline. We compared outcomes for new users of 2 versus 1 and 3 or 4 versus 1 medications using the inverse probability of treatment-weighted odds ratios with 95% CI. The cohort comprised 4787 residents, with a total of 509 death, 820 functional decline, and 1226 rehospitalization events. Compared with individuals who initiated 1 medication, mortality odds ratios were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.79-1.22) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.97) for users of 2 and 3 or 4 medications, respectively. Rehospitalization odds ratios were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.85-1.17) for 2 and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.8-1.17) for 3 or 4 medications. Functional decline odds ratios were 1.04 (95% CI, 0.85-1.28) for 2 and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.89-1.40) for 3 or 4 medications. In a stability analysis excluding antiplatelet drugs from the exposure definition, more medication use was associated with functional decline. Conclusions Use of more guideline-recommended medications after myocardial infarction was associated with decreased mortality in older, predominantly frail adults, but no difference in rehospitalization. Results for functional decline from the main and stability analyses were discordant and did not rule out an increased risk associated with more medication use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zullo et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction in frail older adults (n=4,787). Initiation of 3 or 4 secondary prevention medications (antiplatelets, β-blockers, statins, and RAAS inhibitors) vs. Initiation of 1 secondary prevention medication was evaluated on 90-day mortality (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.97). Initiation of 3 or 4 secondary prevention medications was associated with a 26% lower risk of 90-day mortality (OR 0.74) compared to 1 medication in frail older adults after acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: