Key result
An individualized approach is needed to balance the risks for thromboembolism and bleeding in patients receiving target-specific oral anticoagulants or warfarin.
Why the study?
How should the risks of thromboembolism and bleeding be balanced in patients receiving oral anticoagulants?
How should the risks of thromboembolism and bleeding be balanced in patients receiving oral anticoagulants?
This review highlights the need for individualized risk assessment and management strategies to balance thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients on oral anticoagulants, particularly during periprocedural interruptions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports individualized anticoagulant risk assessment; leaves open prospective validation of periprocedural strategies.
PURPOSE: To describe the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and rate of bleeding complications from warfarin and target-specific oral anticoagulants; methods for assessing the risk for thromboembolism and bleeding in patients receiving oral anticoagulants or temporarily interrupting such therapy to undergo elective invasive procedures or surgery; therapeutic strategies for balancing these risks; and coagulation assays used to monitor oral anticoagulation therapy. SUMMARY: The target-specific oral anticoagulants have a more specific mechanism of action and shorter elimination half-lives than warfarin, but the half-lives of these target-specific agents may be prolonged in patients with renal impairment or elderly patients, resulting in the potential for drug accumulation and bleeding complications. The rate of bleeding complications in the community setting may be higher than in the clinical trial setting. In patients receiving oral anticoagulants or temporarily interrupting oral anticoagulant therapy to undergo elective invasive procedures or surgery, the risks for thromboembolism and bleeding should be assessed by using validated risk scoring systems and patient stratification schemes. The time during which an oral anticoagulant should be withheld before an invasive procedure or surgery and the time until resumption of therapy after the procedure depend on the drug, risk of thrombosis, type of procedure (i.e., risk for bleeding), and patient-specific variables, especially renal function for the target-specific agents. New coagulation assays are in development for use in monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSION: An individualized approach is needed to balance the risks for thromboembolism and bleeding in patients receiving oral anticoagulants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edith A. Nutescu (2013) conducted a review in Patients receiving oral anticoagulants. Target-specific oral anticoagulants vs. Warfarin was evaluated. An individualized approach is needed to balance the risks for thromboembolism and bleeding in patients receiving target-specific oral anticoagulants or warfarin.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: