Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background— The Fick principle (cardiac output = oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 )/systemic arterio-venous oxygen difference) is used to determine cardiac output in numerous clinical situations. However, estimated rather than measured V ˙ O 2 is commonly used because of complexities of the measurement, though the accuracy of estimation remains uncertain in contemporary clinical practice. Methods and Results— From 1996 to 2005, resting V ˙ O 2 was measured via the Douglas bag technique in adult patients undergoing right heart catheterization. Resting V ˙ O 2 was estimated by each of 3 published formulae. Agreement between measured and estimated V ˙ O 2 was assessed overall, and across strata of body mass index, sex, and age. The study included 535 patients, with mean age 55 yrs, mean body mass index 28.4 kg/m 2 ; 53% women; 64% non-white. Mean (±standard deviation) measured V ˙ O 2 was 241 ± 57 ml/min. Measured V ˙ O 2 differed significantly from values derived from all 3 formulae, with median (interquartile range) absolute differences of 28.4 (13.1, 50.2) ml/min, 37.7 (19.4, 63.3) ml/min, and 31.7 (14.4, 54.5) ml/min, for the formulae of Dehmer, LaFarge, and Bergstra, respectively ( P <0.0001 for each). The measured and estimated values differed by >25% in 17% to 25% of patients depending on the formula used. Median absolute differences were greater in severely obese patients (body mass index > 40 kg/m 2 ), but were not affected by sex or age. Conclusions— Estimates of resting V ˙ O 2 derived from conventional formulae are inaccurate, especially in severely obese individuals. When accurate hemodynamic assessment is important for clinical decision-making, V ˙ O 2 should be directly measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narang et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: