The K-nearest neighbor algorithm using galvanic skin response signals achieved 98.2% accuracy with automatic feature extraction and 96.9% with statistical feature extraction for anxiety detection.
Do machine learning algorithms, specifically KNN with automatic feature extraction, accurately classify anxiety using galvanic skin response signals?
The K-nearest neighbor algorithm combined with an autoencoder for automatic feature extraction of galvanic skin response signals achieves high accuracy (98.2%) in detecting anxiety.
Absolute Event Rate: 98.2% vs 96.9%
Anxiety is a significant mental health concern that can be effectively monitored using physiological signals such as galvanic skin response (GSR). While the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms to enhance the classification of anxiety based on GSR signals is promising, their effectiveness in this context remains largely underexplored. This study addresses this gap by investigating the performance of three commonly used ML algorithms, support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and random forest (RF), in classifying anxiety and stress activity using a benchmark dataset. We employed two feature extraction methods: traditional statistical feature extraction and an innovative automatic feature extraction approach utilizing a 14-layer autoencoder, aimed at improving classification performance. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of using GSR signals and the robust performance of the KNN algorithm in accurately classifying anxiety levels. The KNN algorithm achieved the highest accuracy in both the statistical and automatic feature extraction approaches, with results of 96.9% and 98.2%, respectively. These findings highlight the effectiveness of KNN for anxiety detection and emphasize the need for advanced feature extraction techniques to enhance classification outcomes in mental health monitoring.
Al-Nafjan et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Anxiety and stress. K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm with automatic feature extraction vs. KNN with statistical feature extraction, SVM, and RF was evaluated on Classification accuracy of anxiety levels. The K-nearest neighbor algorithm using galvanic skin response signals achieved 98.2% accuracy with automatic feature extraction and 96.9% with statistical feature extraction for anxiety detection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: