Abrupt increases in pacing rate resulted in faster QT interval adaptation (136 s) compared to abrupt decreases in pacing rate (189 s, p<0.01).
Observational (n=7)
Absolute Event Rate: 136% vs 189%
p-value: p=<0.01
The rate of QT adaptation to abrupt changes in pacing rate was studied in seven patients with newly diagnosed complete heart block with a ventricular escape rate of less than 40 beats.min-1. Their median age was 70 (range 36-84) years, and none was taking any cardioactive medication known to affect the QT interval. From a baseline pacing rate of 50 or 110 beats.min-1 the ventricular rate was increased or decreased to a new level. The time taken for the ventricular paced QT interval to complete 90% of the change secondary to the change in rate was found to be 136(16) s (mean(SEM] when the rate was increasing and 189(25) s when the rate was decreasing (p less than 0.01). This time interval was independent of the magnitude of the rate change and the baseline heart rate from which the change occurred. Furthermore, the time course of QT adaptation was found to be exponential and was characterised by a time constant of 49.1(2.2) s when the rate was increasing and 60.4(2.0) s when the rate was decreasing (p less than 0.01). It is concluded that QT measurements in response to a change in pacing rate should take into account the time dependent nature of QT changes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cardiovascular Research
St George's, University of London
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Lau et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Complete heart block (n=7). Abrupt increase in pacing rate vs. Abrupt decrease in pacing rate was evaluated on Time taken for the ventricular paced QT interval to complete 90% of the change (p=<0.01). Abrupt increases in pacing rate resulted in faster QT interval adaptation (136 s) compared to abrupt decreases in pacing rate (189 s, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: