Key result
An elevated i-BIO score is linked to ~7-fold greater coronary atherosclerosis risk.
Why the study?
The study aimed to assess the feasibility of combining biochemical and imaging parameters into an integrated biomarker to estimate the risk and severity of coronary atherosclerosis and validate it in an independent cohort.
Does an integrated biomarker (i-BIO) accurately detect the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis?
Observational (n=216)
Does an integrated biomarker (i-BIO) accurately detect the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis?
A novel integrated biomarker combining biochemical and imaging parameters can effectively estimate the risk and severity of coronary atherosclerosis.
May support noninvasive CAD risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a combination of biochemical and imaging parameters for estimation of risk and severity of coronary atherosclerosis (CA), and to verify the created integrated biomarker (i-BIO) on independent cohort. METHODS: = 216, respectively). The extent of CA was assessed by Gensini Score (GS). RESULTS: According to GS, participants were distributed as follows: atherosclerosis-free (GS = 0), CA of any stage (GS > 0), subclinical CA (GS < 35), severe CA (GS ≥ 35). Based on the analysis of mathematical models, including biochemical and imaging parameters, we selected and combined the most significant variables as i-BIO. The ability of i-BIO to detect the presence and severity of CA was estimated using ROC-analysis with cut-off points determination. Risk of any CA (GS > 0) at i-BIO > 4 was 7.3 times higher than in those with i-BIO ≤ 4; risk of severe CA (GS ≥ 35) at i-BIO ≥ 9 was 3.1 times higher than at i-BIO < 9. Results on the tested cohort confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: The i-BIO > 4 detected CA (GS > 0) with sensitivity of 87.9%, i-BIO ≥ 9 excluded patients without severe CA (GS < 35), specificity 79.8%. Validation of i-BIO confirmed the feasibility of i-BIO > 4 to separate patients with any CA with sensitivity 76.2%, and of i-BIO ≥ 9 to exclude atherosclerosis-free subjects with specificity of 84.0%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Metelskaya et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Coronary atherosclerosis (n=216). Integrated biomarker (i-BIO) vs. i-BIO ≤ 4 or < 9 was evaluated on Presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis (Gensini Score) (RR 7.3). An integrated biomarker (i-BIO) score >4 was associated with a 7.3-fold higher risk of any coronary atherosclerosis and detected the disease with 87.9% sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: