Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The success of C 4 plants lies in their ability to attain greater efficiencies of light, water and nitrogen use under high temperature, providing an advantage in arid, hot environments. However, C 4 grasses are not necessarily less sensitive to drought than C 3 grasses and are proposed to respond with greater metabolic limitations, while the C 3 response is predominantly stomatal. The aims of this study were to compare the drought and recovery responses of co-occurring C 3 and C 4 NADP-ME grasses from the subfamily Panicoideae and to determine stomatal and metabolic contributions to the observed response. Methods Six species of locally co-occurring grasses, C 3 species Alloteropsis semialata subsp. eckloniana, Panicum aequinerve and Panicum ecklonii, and C 4 (NADP-ME) species Heteropogon contortus, Themeda triandra and Tristachya leucothrix, were established in pots then subjected to a controlled drought followed by re-watering. Water potentials, leaf gas exchange and the response of photosynthetic rate to internal CO 2 concentrations were determined on selected occasions during the drought and re-watering treatments and compared between species and photosynthetic types. Key Results Leaves of C 4 species of grasses maintained their photosynthetic advantage until water deficits became severe, but lost their water-use advantage even under conditions of mild drought. Declining C 4 photosynthesis with water deficit was mainly a consequence of metabolic limitations to CO 2 assimilation, whereas, in the C 3 species, stomatal limitations had a prevailing role in the drought-induced decrease in photosynthesis. The drought-sensitive metabolism of the C 4 plants could explain the observed slower recovery of photosynthesis on re-watering, in comparison with C 3 plants which recovered a greater proportion of photosynthesis through increased stomatal conductance. Conclusions Within the Panicoid grasses, C 4 (NADP-ME) species are metabolically more sensitive to drought than C 3 species and recover more slowly from drought.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ripley et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: