Key result
Higher carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound intensity predicts active Takayasu arteritis with ~86% AUC.
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the usefulness of carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing disease activity in patients with Takayasu arteritis.
Does carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound accurately assess disease activity in patients with Type I Takayasu arteritis?
Observational (n=86)
No
Does carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound accurately assess disease activity in patients with Type I Takayasu arteritis?
Effect estimate: AUC 86.3% (95% CI 79.7-92.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.09% vs 1.44%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound provides a high predictive value for assessing disease activity in patients with Type I Takayasu arteritis, serving as a useful imaging biomarker.
May aid noninvasive TA activity assessment; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
To investigate the usefulness of carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in assessment of disease activity in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA).After screening 219 CEUS records from 124 consecutive patients followed at our clinic between October 2014 and May 2018, data were analysed from 159 carotid CEUS from 86 patients diagnosed with Type I TA. Patients were categorized based on disease activity according to National Institutes of Health criteria into two groups: active disease group (92 CEUS) and non-active disease group (67 CEUS). The enhanced intensity of carotid artery wall: (i) was higher in active disease group than in non-active disease group (3.09 ± 1.67 dB vs. 1.44 ± 1.29 dB, P < 0.0001, respectively); and (ii) had a high predictive value for TA disease activity with area under the curve (AUC) of 86.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 79.7-92.9], sensitivity of 88.0%, and specificity of 79.1%. The latter AUC was not significantly affected (P > 0.05) when erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein level, or arterial wall thickness were added to assessment of disease activity in TA.Carotid vascularization by CEUS, as sole inflammatory marker, had a high predictive value for disease activity in Type I TA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Takayasu arteritis (n=86). Carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) vs. Non-active disease group was evaluated on Enhanced intensity of carotid artery wall (AUC 86.3%, 95% CI 79.7-92.9, p=<0.0001). Carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound had higher enhanced intensity in active vs non-active Takayasu arteritis (3.09 vs 1.44 dB, P<0.0001) and strongly predicted disease activity (AUC 86.3%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: