Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper addresses a few selected aspects of the implementation of the new mandatory exceptions of Arts. 3 to 7 of the Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market (Directive (EU) 2019/790). These provisions consolidate a trend in EU law to further harmonise exceptions and limitations within the EU internal market, to ensure that copyright law operates in a manner that is compatible with fundamental rights and constitutional norms, including freedom of information and expression, freedom of arts and sciences, freedom to conduct a business, as well as fostering technological and economic development. In this context, we welcome the European legislature’s efforts to extend and update the existing regime of exceptions and limitations to promote cross-border uses and ensure that the system functions more effectively in today’s technological environment. However, while the introduction of the exceptions and limitations established under Arts. 3-6 represents an important step in the right direction, it remains a modest one. Member States will play a fundamental role in securing that the mandatory minimum level of freedom for users under these new exceptions and limitations becomes a reality and should refrain from imposing specific restrictive conditions at national level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griffiths et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: