Key result
ECG imaging reveals consistently positive AT-RT slopes in IVCD and LBBB versus narrow QRS patients.
Why the study?
Delayed ventricular conduction is typically accompanied by discordant T-waves, but its link to regional repolarization is unknown.
Does delayed ventricular activation alter the relationship between activation and repolarization times on epicardial electrocardiographic imaging compared to normal ventricular activation?
Observational
Does delayed ventricular activation alter the relationship between activation and repolarization times on epicardial electrocardiographic imaging compared to normal ventricular activation?
Delayed ventricular activation is associated with a consistently positive activation-repolarization time relationship on the epicardium, challenging the physiological assumption that late-activated regions always have shorter repolarization intervals.
In healthy human hearts, the T-wave is concordant with the QRS-complex, which is often explained by the negative relationship between the activation (AT) and repolarization time (RT). Delayed ventricular conduction is typically accompanied by discordant T-waves, but the link to regional repolarization is unknown. The present study aimed to compare AT-RT relationships in patients with narrow QRS-complexes (nQRS) vs. patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction disturbances (IVCD) using electrocardiographic imaging to reconstruct epicardial unipolar electrograms. Evaluations included the slopes of AT-RT relationships, maximum (max) AT and RT, ventricular electrical uncoupling (VEU; the difference of mean AT or RT between the left and right ventricle), and the standard deviation of AT (SDAT) and RT (SDRT). In nQRS patients, the AT-RT slope was highly variable (-0.370 ± 1.125, P = 0.193 ± 0.212), whereas it was consistently positive in IVCD and LBBB patients (1.220 ± 0.907 and 0.968 ± 0.325, P = 0.0172 ± 0.0254 and P = 0.0219 ± 0.0657 respectively). Max AT, max RT, AT-VEU, RT-VEU, SDAT and SDRT were similar for IVCD and LBBB patients and significantly higher compared to nQRS patients. In patients with delayed ventricular activation, there was a positive association between AT-VEU and RT-VEU (r = 0.549, P = 0.0149). The present study demonstrates that, in nQRS rhythms with concordant T-waves, the physiological assumption that sites of late activation have shorter repolarization intervals might not be consistently present at the epicardium. Furthermore, delayed ventricular activation is associated with delayed completion of repolarization and a dyssynchronous activation is accompanied by a dyssynchronous repolarization. KEY POINTS: This study examines the relationships between activation and repolarization times in epicardial reconstructed unipolar electrograms derived from ECG-imaging in patients with normal and delayed ventricular activation. In patients with a narrow QRS-complex and concordant T-waves on a 12-lead ECG, ECG-imaging reveals significant variability in the activation-repolarization time relationship. The physiological assumption that late-activated regions have a shorter repolarization interval may thus not always be valid on the epicardium. Patients with delayed ventricular activation typically exhibit discordant T-wave polarity on a 12-lead ECG and consistently demonstrate a positive activation-repolarization time relationship on ECG-imaging: regions of early activation correspond to shorter repolarization intervals, whereas regions of late activation correspond to longer repolarization intervals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smits et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction disturbances (IVCD). Electrocardiographic imaging (ECG-imaging) vs. Narrow QRS-complexes (nQRS) was evaluated on Slopes of activation time (AT) and repolarization time (RT) relationships. ECG imaging revealed a highly variable AT-RT slope in narrow QRS patients (-0.370 ± 1.125) but a consistently positive slope in IVCD (1.220 ± 0.907) and LBBB (0.968 ± 0.325) patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: