Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Photograph of 1 7 urban recreation sites in Chicago and Atlanta were evaluated by college students (n = 6 8) in Illinois, Georgia, and Michigan, for either perceived securig, scenic qualily, or both. For most raters, high visibilig and developed park features significantly enhanced per-ceived securily. Scenic qualily, on the other hand, was enhanced for the major-ily of evaluators by a high degree of naturalness and vegetation. For both per-ceived safely and scenic qualily, a small minorig of raters held prefeences quite diJierent from the majorily.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schroeder et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: